1st tournament, Beginner level, Round Robin Tournament.

 

Match 1 results

 

 Bust Totals

• Sebastian Smith: 10 busts (spread across Round 1 & Round 2)

• Joshua Gannon: 7 busts (spread across Round 1 & Round 2)

​

 Round 1 Analysis

Sebastian Smith

• 1 Leader Penalty ( Main Judge)

• Multiple Follower Trick Busts (5 total in Round 1)

• Top Line Busts (2 in Round 1)

 Pattern: Sebastian struggled heavily in Round 1, with repeated trick execution errors judged by the Main Judge, and also multiple top line busts, suggesting issues with line discipline and following the leader’s track.

Joshua Gannon

• Bottom Line Bust (2:40:55, Bottom Judge)

• Trick Bust (2:41:13, Main Judge)

 Pattern: Joshua had a lighter Round 1 with just 2 busts. His errors were more about line positioning (bottom line)rather than repeated trick mistakes.

​

 Round 2 Analysis

Sebastian Smith

• Top Line Busts (1 at 2:44:52, Top Judge)

• Trick Bust (1 at 2:44:56, Main Judge)

 Pattern: Improved compared to Round 1 (only 2 busts), but still struggled with trick consistency and line awareness.

Joshua Gannon

• 1 Trick Bust

• 3 Bottom Line Busts (clustered close together in time: 2:46:59–2:47:37)

 Pattern: Joshua had a worse Round 2, with 4 busts total—mostly bottom line errors. This suggests fatigue or difficulty maintaining vertical alignment during the later part of the match.

​

 Comparative Insights

• Sebastian Smith:

  • Higher bust total overall (10 vs 7).

  • More diverse mistakes (leader penalty, top line, trick busts).

  • Struggled especially in trick execution—6 of his 10 busts came from this category.

  • Improvement in Round 2 (fewer busts than Round 1).

• Joshua Gannon:

  • Fewer total busts (7 total).

  • More concentrated errors: 5 of 7 busts were bottom line, meaning consistent issues with staying high/low relative to the leader.

  • Round 1 was solid (only 2 busts), but Round 2 collapse (5 busts) dragged him down.

​

 Overall Match Picture

• Consistency: Joshua was more consistent in Round 1 but broke down in Round 2.

• Volume of Errors: Sebastian had more busts overall and a rougher start, but steadied in Round 2.

• Categories of Mistakes: Sebastian = trick-heavy mistakes, Joshua = bottom line discipline mistakes.

 Depending on the judging weight, Joshua might still edge out Round 1, but Sebastian’s recovery and Joshua’s Round 2 collapse could swing the match.

​

Match 2 results

Bust Totals

• Shalaura Bromilow: 25 busts

• Jakob Kapelj: 7 busts

This is a huge difference in discipline and execution.

​

 Round 1 Analysis

Shalaura Bromilow

• 11 busts in Round 1:

  • 7 × Top Line Busts (repeated line errors, Top Judge)

  • 4 × Trick Busts (execution errors, Main Judge)

  • 1 × Bottom Line Bust

 Pattern:
Shalaura’s Round 1 shows constant top line errors, meaning she was repeatedly flying too high relative to the leader. Combined with trick busts, this suggests she was struggling to stay controlled while executing moves.

Jakob Kapelj

• 2 busts in Round 1:

  • Both were Trick Busts (Main Judge)

 Pattern:
Jakob started clean compared to Shalaura, only slipping on trick execution.

​

 Round 2 Analysis

Shalaura Bromilow

• 14 busts in Round 2:

  • 9 × Top Line Busts

  • 5 × Trick Busts

 Pattern:
Round 2 continued the same issues. She kept overshooting vertically (top line busts) and compounding with trick execution failures. Busts came every few seconds — showing continuous instability across the round.

Jakob Kapelj

• 5 busts in Round 2:

  • 1 × Top Line Bust

  • 4 × Trick Busts

 Pattern:
Jakob made more mistakes in Round 2 than Round 1, but still at a much lower frequency than Shalaura. His main weakness was trick consistency, not line discipline.

​

 Comparative Insights

• Shalaura Bromilow:

  • 25 busts = very high compared to Jakob.

  • Major recurring issue: Top Line Busts (16 total) → likely an inability to control altitude relative to leader.

  • Secondary issue: Trick Busts (9 total) → execution breaking down when attempting moves.

  • Round 2 didn’t show improvement — mistakes escalated.

• Jakob Kapelj:

  • Far fewer busts overall (7 total).

  • Strong line discipline (only 1 top line bust).

  • Weak spot: Trick execution (6 of 7 busts), showing that while he stayed in slot, his move accuracy slipped.

  • Maintained control and avoided repeated positional errors.

​

 Overall Match Picture

• Control: Jakob had strong control; Shalaura repeatedly overshot vertical lines.

• Consistency: Jakob was consistent both rounds; Shalaura struggled continuously.

• Numbers: Shalaura’s 25 busts vs Jakob’s 7 makes this a clear win for Jakob Kapelj.

 Unless the scoring system gave extra weight to difficulty of tricks (and Shalaura attempted harder moves), Jakob should decisively take this matchup.

​

​

Match 3

Bust Totals

• Jakob Kapelj: 11 busts (6 in Round 1, 5 in Round 2)

• Sebastian Smith: 7 busts (4 in Round 1, 3 in Round 2)

​

 Round 1 Analysis

Jakob Kapelj

• 6 busts total

  • 4 × Trick Busts (Main Judge)

  • 2 × Bottom Line Busts (Bottom Judge)

 Pattern: Jakob’s Round 1 was dominated by trick execution errors — struggling with precision and control during moves. The bottom line slips show he was also occasionally sinking too low.

Sebastian Smith

• 4 busts total

  • 3 × Bottom Line Busts

  • 1 × Trick Bust

 Pattern: Sebastian’s Round 1 mistakes were mainly vertical control (bottom line), suggesting he was sitting too low relative to the leader. Compared to Jakob, he had fewer trick problems.

​

 Round 2 Analysis

Jakob Kapelj

• 5 busts total

  • 4 × Trick Busts

  • 1 × Bottom Line Bust

 Pattern: Same story as Round 1 — Jakob stayed mostly clean on lines but kept busting tricks, showing consistent execution issues when moves were called.

Sebastian Smith

• 3 busts total

  • 1 × Trick Bust

  • 1 × Bottom Line Bust

  • 1 × Top Line Bust

 Pattern: Sebastian was steadier — only 3 errors spread across categories. His busts show a balance of line discipline slips (both top and bottom) with one trick miss, but not repeated breakdowns.

​

 Comparative Insights

• Jakob Kapelj

  • Higher total (11 busts vs 7).

  • Clear weakness = trick execution (8 out of 11 busts).

  • Showed repeated difficulty sticking tricks cleanly both rounds.

• Sebastian Smith

  • Cleaner overall (7 busts).

  • Main weakness = line control (5 out of 7 busts were top/bottom line).

  • More balanced errors, but not as repetitive as Jakob’s.

​

 Overall Match Picture

• Round 1: Jakob (6 busts) vs Sebastian (4 busts) → Sebastian edges it with fewer mistakes and more control.

• Round 2: Jakob (5 busts) vs Sebastian (3 busts) → Sebastian again cleaner.

• Final Totals: Sebastian wins clearly with 7 vs 11 busts.

🥇 Match Winner: Sebastian Smith (cleaner across both rounds, fewer repetitive errors).

​

Match 4

Bust Totals

• Shalaura Bromilow: 8 busts (3 in Round 1, 5 in Round 2)

• Joshua Gannon: 2 busts (1 in each round)

​

 Round 1 Analysis

Shalaura Bromilow

• 3 busts total

  • All Trick Busts (Main Judge)

 Pattern: Clean on lines in Round 1, but struggled with trick execution three separate times. The mistakes show a repeated difficulty in hitting or controlling trick elements.

Joshua Gannon

• 1 bust total

  • Trick Bust (Main Judge)

 Pattern: Very clean round overall, only a single trick slip. He kept control on both lines.

​

 Round 2 Analysis

Shalaura Bromilow

• 5 busts total

  • 2 × Trick Busts

  • 3 × Bottom Line Busts

 Pattern: Fell apart a bit more here. Still had trick execution errors, but this round introduced line control problems (bottom line) — repeatedly flying too low relative to the leader.

Joshua Gannon

• 1 bust total

  • Trick Bust (Main Judge)

 Pattern: Same as Round 1 — just one trick error. Showed consistent control and awareness.

​

 Comparative Insights

• Shalaura Bromilow

  • 8 busts vs Joshua’s 2 → much heavier mistake load.

  • Main issues: trick execution (5) and bottom line errors (3).

  • Round 2 showed decline, not recovery — the mistakes became more varied and frequent.

• Joshua Gannon

  • Only 2 total busts across 2 rounds.

  • Both busts were trick-related, meaning his line discipline was flawless.

  • Maintained steadiness both rounds.

​

 Overall Match Picture

• Round 1: Joshua (1 bust) vs Shalaura (3 busts) → Joshua wins.

• Round 2: Joshua (1 bust) vs Shalaura (5 busts) → Joshua wins again.

• Final Totals: Joshua 2 vs Shalaura 8.

🥇 Match Winner: Joshua Gannon (dominant control, 2–0)

Match 5

​

Bust Totals

• Joshua Gannon: 7 busts (3 in Round 1, 4 in Round 2)

• Jakob Kapelj: 12 busts (8 in Round 1, 4 in Round 2)

​

 Round 1 Analysis

Joshua Gannon

• 3 busts total

  • 1 × Trick Bust (Main Judge)

  • 2 × Bottom Line Busts (Bottom Judge)

 Pattern: Decent Round 1, but he drifted low twice. Trick accuracy was mostly solid.

Jakob Kapelj

• 8 busts total

  • 3 × Top Line Busts

  • 4 × Bottom Line Busts

  • 2 × Trick Busts

 Pattern: Jakob struggled badly in Round 1. He was swinging above and below the line multiple times, showing vertical instability, on top of a couple trick errors.

 Round 1 Winner: Joshua Gannon (3 vs 8 busts)

​

 Round 2 Analysis

Joshua Gannon

• 4 busts total

  • 2 × Bottom Line Busts

  • 1 × Trick Bust

  • 1 × Leader Penalty (Main Judge)

 Pattern: This was Joshua’s weaker round. The Leader Penalty is costly, and he added more bottom line slips.

Jakob Kapelj

• 4 busts total

  • 2 × Top Line Busts

  • 1 × Bottom Line Bust

  • 1 × Trick Bust

 Pattern: Much cleaner than his Round 1. Mistakes were still spread across line control and tricks, but nothing excessive.

 Round 2 Winner: Very close — both had 4 busts, but Joshua’s Leader Penalty likely tips the round to Jakob.

​

 Comparative Insights

• Joshua Gannon

  • Cleaner in Round 1, steadier overall.

  • Biggest weaknesses: bottom line slips (4 total) + 1 major Leader Penalty.

  • Round 2 decline hurt his chances but still stayed under Jakob’s total.

• Jakob Kapelj

  • Round 1 collapse with 8 busts.

  • Round 2 recovery was solid, but still too many line errors across both rounds (7 out of 12 busts were line-related).

  • Showed lack of consistency — one poor round offset a decent second one.

​

 Overall Match Picture

• Round 1: Clear win for Joshua (3 vs 8).

• Round 2: Jakob slightly edges it (4 vs 4, but Joshua’s leader penalty heavier).

• Final Totals: Joshua 7 vs Jakob 12.

🥇 Match Winner: Joshua Gannon (cleaner across the two rounds, despite a costly leader penalty).

​

​

Match 6

​

Bust Totals

• Shalaura Bromilow: 30 busts (15 in Round 1, 15 in Round 2)

• Sebastian Smith: 10 busts (4 in Round 1, 6 in Round 2)

​

 Round 1 Analysis

Shalaura Bromilow

• 15 busts total

  • 8 × Bottom Line Busts (Bottom Judge)

  • 4 × Trick Busts (Main Judge)

  • 3 × Top Line Busts (Top Judge)

 Pattern: Shalaura was all over the place in Round 1, with constant line errors both top and bottom, and trick misses layered on top. She never really settled into control — busts came almost every few seconds.

Sebastian Smith

• 4 busts total

  • All Trick Busts (Main Judge)

 Pattern: A much steadier round. Sebastian stayed in slot (no top/bottom line busts), but his only weakness was repeated trick execution errors.

 Round 1 Winner: Sebastian Smith (4 vs 15)

​

 Round 2 Analysis

Shalaura Bromilow

• 15 busts total

  • 5 × Bottom Line Busts

  • 6 × Trick Busts

  • 4 × Top Line Busts

 Pattern: Almost identical to Round 1 — a mix of line busts and trick failures throughout. No improvement from the first round, showing sustained instability and lack of control.

Sebastian Smith

• 6 busts total

  • All Trick Busts (Main Judge)

 Pattern: Just like Round 1, Sebastian only slipped on trick execution, but line control remained solid.

 Round 2 Winner: Sebastian Smith (6 vs 15)

​

 Comparative Insights

• Shalaura Bromilow

  • A massive 30 busts — one of the heaviest totals of the tournament.

  • Line control breakdown was the biggest issue (13 top/bottom line busts).

  • Trick execution also weak (17 trick busts).

  • Never found stability in either round.

• Sebastian Smith

  • 10 busts total — far cleaner.

  • All errors were trick-related, showing a narrow weakness rather than systemic instability.

  • Strong line discipline across both rounds.

​

 Overall Match Picture

• Round 1: Sebastian wins (4 vs 15).

• Round 2: Sebastian wins (6 vs 15).

• Final Totals: Sebastian 10 vs Shalaura 30.

🥇 Match Winner: Sebastian Smith (dominant control, 2–0)

​

​

Round robin match Results Recap

1. Sebastian Smith vs Joshua Gannon

• Sebastian: 10 busts

• Joshua: 7 busts
  Winner: Joshua Gannon

​

2. Shalaura Bromilow vs Jakob Kapelj

• Shalaura: 25 busts

• Jakob: 7 busts
  Winner: Jakob Kapelj

​

3. Jakob Kapelj vs Sebastian Smith

• Jakob: 11 busts

• Sebastian: 7 busts
  Winner: Sebastian Smith

​

4. Shalaura Bromilow vs Joshua Gannon

• Shalaura: 8 busts

• Joshua: 2 busts
  Winner: Joshua Gannon

​

5. Joshua Gannon vs Jakob Kapelj

• Joshua: 7 busts

• Jakob: 12 busts
  Winner: Joshua Gannon

​

6. Shalaura Bromilow vs Sebastian Smith

• Shalaura: 30 busts

• Sebastian: 10 busts
  Winner: Sebastian Smith

​

 Win–Loss Records

• Joshua Gannon: 3 wins (vs Sebastian, Shalaura, Jakob) – Undefeated

• Sebastian Smith: 2 wins (vs Jakob, Shalaura), 1 loss (to Joshua)

• Jakob Kapelj: 1 win (vs Shalaura), 2 losses (to Sebastian & Joshua)

• Shalaura Bromilow: 0 wins, 3 losses

​

 Round Robin Winner

🥇 Joshua Gannon — Undefeated (3–0 record)

• Showed the cleanest flying overall.

• His busts were consistently lower and more controlled than the others.

• Only real weak spot: occasional trick execution and bottom line errors, but never collapsed across a round like others did.

​

​